Attorney Search
Advocacy at a Higher Level

Horvitz & Levy is a solutions-based firm focused on appellate success. We are distinguished by our commitment to responsive service and on-going innovation in the areas of civil appellate litigation, amicus curiae support, and trial strategy consultation.

Our firm history, honors and awards, and locations speak to our collaborative approach and commitment to serving clients as well as the outstanding legal resources we bring to bear.

LEARN MORE ABOUT HORVITZ & LEVY
We pride ourselves in producing good results for our clients. Below are selected examples of our clients’ recent victories on appeal. Click the links to read more details.

Consumer Advocates v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation (2005)

California Court of Appeal reverses lemon law injunction against auto manufacturer.

Tutor-Saliba-Perini v. Metropolitan Transit Authority (2005)

California Court of Appeal reverses $60 million False Claims Act judgment against construction contractor.

Taylor v. Kuwatch (2004)

$1 million defamation judgment against former political candidate reversed.

Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2004)

California Supreme Court holds that replacement or restitution remedy is not required under California’s lemon law for breach of a service contract.

Lockheed Litigation Cases (2004)

California Court of Appeal affirms exclusion under the California Evidence Code of expert testimony concerning the ability of a range of chemicals to cause cancer.

Bryan v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (2003)

California Court of Appeal decertifies multi-state class action against mortgage lender.

Coppola v. Warner Bros. (2003)

California Court of Appeal reverses $80 million award against Warner Bros.

Lewis Jorge Const. Management, Inc. v. Pomona Unified School Dist. (2004)

California Supreme Court holds that contractor’s damages against school district for breaching construction contract do not include alleged lost profits attributed to impaired bonding capacity.

Bird v. Saenz (2002)

California Supreme Court limits recovery of emotional distress damages to relatives of injured hospital patient.

The Alliance for Children's Rights v. L.A. County Dept. of Children & Family Services (2002)

California Court of Appeal upholds juvenile court’s authority to monitor social workers’ visitation of dependent foster children.

Page 32 of 33