Attorney Search
Advocacy at a Higher Level

Horvitz & Levy is a solutions-based firm focused on appellate success. We are distinguished by our commitment to responsive service and on-going innovation in the areas of civil appellate litigation, amicus curiae support, and trial strategy consultation.

Our firm history, honors and awards, and locations speak to our collaborative approach and commitment to serving clients as well as the outstanding legal resources we bring to bear.

LEARN MORE ABOUT HORVITZ & LEVY
We pride ourselves in producing good results for our clients. Below are selected examples of our clients’ recent victories on appeal. Click the links to read more details.

Park v. Mobil Oil Guam, Inc. (2004)

Supreme Court of Guam affirmed reduction of punitive damages award against Mobil Oil

Murat v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2015)

California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in asbestos exposure case.

Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. J.R. Marketing, L.L.C. (2015)

California Supreme Court permits insurers to seek reimbursement directly from Cumis counsel for objectively unreasonable billings.

Lockheed Litigation Cases (Group 9) (2015)

California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in long-running toxic tort case.

Cromer v. Bristol West Insurance Group/Coast National Insurance Co. (2015)

Nevada Supreme Court affirms judgment for insurance company after jury trial in insurance bad faith case.

Ironridge Global IV, Ltd. v. ScripsAmerica, Inc. (2015)

California Court of Appeal dismisses opposing party’s appeal under the disentitlement doctrine.

Roman v. BRE Properties (2015)

California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for apartment owner accused of discrimination.

Ralphs Grocery Company v. Midtown Shopping Center Associates (2015)

California Court of Appeal reverses judgment against Ralphs Grocery Company in landlord-tenant dispute.

Donaho v. County of Yuba (2015)

California Court of Appeal rules that public entity is not liable for placement of bus stop near freeway.

Escobedo v. Apple American Group (2015)

Ninth Circuit issues published opinion for pro bono client, clarifies rules for indigent litigants.

Page 23 of 35