Attorney Search
Advocacy at a Higher Level

Horvitz & Levy is a solutions-based firm focused on appellate success. We are distinguished by our commitment to responsive service and on-going innovation in the areas of civil appellate litigation, amicus curiae support, and trial strategy consultation.

Our firm history, honors and awards, and locations speak to our collaborative approach and commitment to serving clients as well as the outstanding legal resources we bring to bear.

John A. Taylor, Jr.

John A. Taylor, Jr.

Partner - Los Angeles Office

How John Helps Clients

A California State Bar Certified Appellate Specialist, John A. Taylor, Jr. has helped numerous clients prevail in high-stakes appeals concerning legal issues of industry-wide importance and from multimillion-dollar judgments. 

John has argued appeals throughout the state, including several in the California Supreme Court. Among them are a groundbreaking matter addressing automobile manufacturers’ warranty liability (Gavaldon v. Daimler Chrysler) and an intellectual property case in which the court overturned a $15 million judgment against a coffee manufacturer based on alleged unauthorized use of the plaintiff’s image on labeling (Christoff v. Nestlé USA, Inc.). John’s name currently appears on over 100 appellate decisions, including more than 50 published opinions. He has been lead appellate counsel in dozens of civil appeals for individuals, insurers, and entities in the entertainment, automotive, and other industries, including matters involving entertainment law, the right of publicity, the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), breach of contract, insurance coverage, wage and hour law, employment discrimination, personal injury, California’s “lemon law,” arbitration awards, and trusts and estates. John’s many victories include his role as lead counsel in (Don Johnson Productions, Inc. v. Rysher Entertainment), obtaining a $37 million reduction of a $52 million judgment against his client

John is a partner at the firm, where he has been practicing appellate law since 1993. Before joining the firm, John was a litigation associate with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

John has authored numerous amicus curiae briefs in the California Supreme Court on issues such as evidentiary requirements in product liability and wage and hour litigation; the scope and application of Proposition 64’s amendments to the UCL; public policy issues arising out of subcontractor indemnity provisions in residential construction contracts; the constitutionality of Proposition 5, the Indian gaming initiative; and the validity of the Seaman's tort.

Representative Matters

Ayers v. FCA (2024)
Horvitz & Levy persuaded the Court of Appeal to issue a published opinion that rejects a commonly used tactic to inflate attorney fee awards in lemon law cases.

Urick v. Urick III
California Court of Appeal holds that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a continuance after a party’s attorney was hospitalized days before trial.

Viasat v. Acacia Communications (2022)
California Court of Appeal affirms $49 million breach of contract verdict in complex commercial dispute involving misuse of intellectual property.

Riskin v. Downtown LA Property Owners Association (2022)
California Court of Appeal reverses attorney fees award in California Public Records Act case.

Mallonee v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (2022)
California Court of Appeal affirms order cutting attorney fees request by 85 percent in lemon law action.

Covert v. FCA USA, LLC (2022)
California Court of Appeal reverses $200,000 attorney fees and costs award in lemon law action.

Fishback v. FCA (2021)
Court of Appeal holds that trial court was not required to “show its work” when reducing or disallowing plaintiff’s attorney fees.

A&S Metal Recycling, Inc. v. Wilson’s Metal Exchange, Inc. (2020)
California Court of Appeal affirms denial of anti-SLAPP motion in defamation case arising out of commercial dispute between business competitors.

Green Gate Services, LLC v. Daniel Koetting (2020)
Horvitz & Levy obtains reversal of judgment confirming multimillion dollar arbitration award.

Handlers-Bryman v. El Pollo Loco (2020)
Horvitz & Levy secures stipulated reversal of multimillion dollar judgment and injunction restricting El Pollo Loco’s franchise operations.

Eisen v. Tavangarian (2019)
California Court of Appeal disagrees with prior decision from the same division, reversing judgment requiring partial demolition of remodeled home.

Harbor Missionary Church Corp. v. City of San Buenaventura (2016)
Obtained Ninth Circuit reversal of an order denying a preliminary injunction to protect a church’s religious freedom right to operate a homeless outreach program within the City of Ventura.

Cohen v. Sterling (2015)
Prepared post-trial motions to obtain new trial after $17 million verdict arising out of apartment fire, and obtained affirmance of the new trial order by the California Court of Appeal.

Noe v. Superior Court (2015)
California Court of Appeal denied a writ petition challenging summary adjudication in favor of our clients (including Anschutz Entertainment Group, Inc.) on a wage-and-hour claim alleging workers who provided concessions at concerts and sporting events were willfully misclassified as independent contractors in violation of Labor Code section 226.8, on the ground that this recently-enacted law did not create a private right of action.

Don Johnson Productions, Inc. v. Rysher Entertainment (2012)
Obtained a $37 million reduction of a $52 million judgment against Rysher Entertainment, a co-producer of the television show Nash Bridges, in California Court of Appeal.

Christoff v. Nestlé USA, Inc. (2009)
Obtained reversal of $15.6 million verdict in the California Court of Appeal and affirmance by the California Supreme Court, holding for the first time that the single publication rule applies to right of publicity claims.

Burlage v. Superior Court (2009)
Obtained affirmance of order vacating $1.5 million arbitration award in California Court of Appeal based on “refusal of the arbitrators to hear evidence material to the controversy,” in first reported decision applying that statutory ground.

Harris v. San Diego Gas & Electric (2007)
Prepared post-trial motions in California Court of Appeal to obtain reduction of punitive damages award from $40.5 million to $8.5 million.

Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2004)
Obtained holding of industry-wide importance from the California Supreme Court that California’s “lemon law” applies only during the original warranty and not to separately purchased service contracts for post-warranty repairs.


  • Harvard Law School
    J.D., magna cum laude, 1985
  • Brigham Young University
    B.A., summa cum laude, 1982


  • Hon. Patrick J. Higginbotham, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (1985-1986)

Bar Admissions

  • California
  • Utah
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Professional Associations


  • "Top 100 list of leading lawyers in California" by the Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journal (2009)
  • “AV Preeminent” rated by Martindale Hubbell
  • Super Lawyers (2006-2024)
  • Best Lawyers (2006-2023)
  • Ranked in the appellate litigation category by Chambers & Partners USA
  • Outstanding Lawyer” of the year by the Los Angeles Chapter of the J. Reuben Clark Law Society (2017)