Practice Areas
- Amicus Support & Shaping the Law
- Anti-SLAPP Motions & Appeals
- Business & Commercial Law
- California Supreme Court & Court of Appeal
- Class Actions
- Consumer Law
- Entertainment Law
- Federal Appellate Practice
- First Amendment
- Healthcare Litigation
- Insurance Litigation
- Intellectual Property
- Labor & Employment Litigation
- Premises Liability
- Pro Bono
- Products Liability & Toxic Torts
- Professional Responsibility & Liability
- Public Entity Liability
- Punitive Damages
- Real Property Litigation
- Trial Consultation
Horvitz & Levy appears more often in the California appellate courts than any other firm. In the California Supreme Court, we have appeared as counsel of record or as counsel for amicus curiae in nearly 200 cases over the last 30 years, including 60 appearances in the last decade. In the California Court of Appeal, we have appeared as counsel of record in more than 1,300 cases since 1990.
As a result of our extensive experience, we have an unparalleled knowledge of the justices, procedures, and culture of the California appellate courts. Members of our firm literally wrote the book on California appellate practice. Founding partner Ellis J. Horvitz was one of the original co-authors of the leading treatise on civil appeals and writs in California, the Rutter Group's California Practice Guide: Civil Appeals and Writs. Curt Cutting and Bradley S. Pauley are co-authors of the California chapter of the Appellate Practice Compendium, published by the American Bar Association.
Our experience has translated into results. For example, since 2008 we have prevailed in 55% of cases in which we have represented appellants, compared to an average success rate of 20-25% for California civil appeals.
We have been ranked as the #1 appellate practice in California by The Best Lawyers In America, and listed in the highest tier of California appellate firms by Chambers and Partners U.S.A., which has lauded the "strong performance and fresh perspective" of our attorneys and our "insight into the workings of the Supreme Court of California."
Horvitz & Levy also conducts and participates in appellate moot courts for attorneys and clients dealing with high-stakes and complex matters. Participation in our moot court sessions, followed by in-depth discussions and comprehensive evaluations of issues and strategies by our experts, delivers invaluable insights. Our moot courts can uncover potential challenges, help prepare for the unexpected, and give clients a winning edge.
Drawing on our extensive experience in the California Supreme Court, we provide news and commentary on the practice of law before that court through our blog, At the Lectern. Contact H. Thomas Watson and Emily V. Cuatto for more information about our California Supreme Court & Court of Appeal practice.
Drost v. Sheridan
California Court of Appeal affirms application of MICRA to reduce damages award against chiropractor from $29.5 million to $250,000.
Read MoreWard v. Billinglsey
California Court of Appeal affirms defense judgment after plaintiff claims discrimination in jury selection.
Read MoreCharlie L. v. Kangavari
California Court of Appeal publishes opinion holding that a statute providing procedural safeguards for ER surgeons against medical malpractice claims also protects other physicians who consult remotely with the ER department
Read MoreNavarro v. Cervera
Court of Appeal emphasizes that Domestic Violence Protection Act must be applied to achieve its protective purposes.
Read MoreCollins v. Diamond Generating Corporation
California Court of Appeal reverses $104 million wrongful death judgment based on trial court’s refusal to instruct jury on the Privette doctrine.
Read MoreAldaco v. FMC
California Court of Appeal rules that used vehicles sold with a remaining new car warranty balance are not “consumer goods” within the meaning of the Song-Beverly Act.
Read MoreHill Family LP v. Trader Joe's
California Court of Appeal rules that Trader Joe’s is entitled to express indemnity arising out of a lease agreement.
Read MoreLloyd v. Byrd Technologies
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment for product defendant, rejecting plaintiff’s challenge to the trial court’s response to jury questions.
Read MoreRodriguez v. FCA
California Supreme Court rules that used vehicles sold with a remaining new car warranty balance are not “new motor vehicles” subject to the Song-Beverly Act’s refund-or-replace remedy.
Read MoreMartinez Iriqui v. Latt
California Court of Appeal rules that trial court’s discovery and trial-scheduling rulings did not constitute a “structural error” requiring a new trial.
Read MoreValdovinos v. Kia
California Court of Appeal reverses jury’s award of unrecoverable elements of restitution and affirms new trial on civil penalties in lemon law case.
Read MoreSamuelian v. Life Generations Healthcare, LLC
In a published opinion, California Court of Appeal holds that noncompetition provisions are binding on partial owners of a business unless the provisions are unreasonable, reversing confirmation of a $40 million arbitration award.
Read MoreWashington 111 v. Kelsey
California Court of Appeal rules that commercial landlord is entitled to a new trial in dispute with former tenant.
Read MoreGreisman v. FCA US, LLC
In partially published opinion, California Court of Appeal affirms order enforcing lemon law settlement that plaintiff’s counsel attempted to disavow.
Read MoreTurrieta v. Lyft, Inc.
California Supreme Court holds that plaintiffs cannot intervene in overlapping PAGA cases to challenge settlements based on their status as the State’s deputized private attorneys general.
Read MoreMoir v. Ventura Locksmiths
Court of Appeal affirms modest judgment in personal injury action, rejecting plaintiff’s bid for a new trial.
Read MoreA.L. v. Harbor Developmental Disabilities Foundation
California Court of Appeal limits the duties owed by regional centers for the developmentally disabled.
Read MoreCarolina Beverage Corp. v. FIJI Water
California Court of Appeal reverses $6 million award and holds that “constructive termination” of a commercial distribution contract is not a viable theory of recovery under California common law.
Read MoreNovoa v. Honda
California Court of Appeal denies plaintiff’s writ petition on the merits in lemon law arbitration dispute.
Read MoreHoward v. Clark Construction
Horvitz & Levy persuades the Court of Appeal to dismiss appeal from attorney disqualification ruling.
Read MoreAl Shikha v. Lyft
In a published opinion, California Court of Appeal holds there is no common-law duty to run criminal background checks on passengers before they can be permitted to use the Lyft rideshare app.
Read MoreHinshaw v. Anaheim City Centre
Horvitz & Levy successfully defends summary judgment in a premises liability case.
Read MoreDiaz v. Macy's West Stores, Inc.
Ninth Circuit holds that courts cannot require companies to arbitrate Private Attorneys General Act claims on a representative basis where arbitration agreements include a class or collective action waiver.
Read MoreMusharbash v. San Antonio Regional Hospital
Horvitz & Levy successfully secures writ relief ordering summary judgment in favor of hospital in wrongful death.
Read MorePatterson v. College Medical Center
Horvitz & Levy successfully secures writ relief protecting medical center from discovery order compelling it to release psychiatric patients’ contact information.
Read MoreLaMarr v. UC Regents
Horvitz & Levy successfully defends judgment in favor of The UC Regents in an employment case involving an employee who voluntarily transferred to a lower-ranked position to avoid facing possible termination.
Read MoreChino Basin Municipal Water District v. City of Chino
California Court of Appeal rejects challenge to longstanding operating practices of water rights entity.
Read MoreBoermeester v. Carry (II)
California Court of Appeal holds that private universities disciplining students for sexual assault or intimate partner violence may employ an investigatory model in which the same university official acts as investigator and factfinder.
Read MoreAyers v. FCA
Horvitz & Levy persuaded the Court of Appeal to issue a published opinion that rejects a commonly used tactic to inflate attorney fee awards in lemon law cases.
Read MoreMorgenthaler v. Zircon Corporation
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for shipper of goods that hired trucking company whose driver caused an accident.
Read MoreLi v. Cole Haan LLC
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for owner of retail store in premises liability action.
Read MoreGantner v. PG&E
Supreme Court holds that PG&E is not liable for emergency power shutoffs it implemented to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires.
Read MoreJackson v. UC Regents
California Court of Appeal affirms nonsuit in disability discrimination action.
Read MorePerez v. Galt Joint Union Elementary School District
Court of Appeal affirms defense judgment in favor of school district, holding that workers’ compensation provides exclusive remedy to volunteer injured at a spelling bee.
Read MorePacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court (South San Joaquin Irrigation District)
California Court of Appeal holds that, in a utility takings case, a public entity's findings of public necessity and "more necessary public use" are not reviewed by the trial court only for substantial evidence or a gross abuse of discretion.
Read MoreIntellisoft, Ltd. v. Acer America Corporation
California Court of Appeal affirms defense summary judgment in $157.7 million trade secrets misappropriation action.
Read MoreShenoi v. Maya
California Court of Appeal affirms defense judgment in defamation case involving youth soccer league.
Read MoreSalto v. Empire Transportation Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of transportation company following bench trial in negligence action.
Read MoreFyfe v. CCAPP
California Court of Appeal holds that a nonprofit organization did not violate the common law right to fair procedure when it suspended an individual’s alcohol and drug counselor certification.
Read MoreBoermeester v. Carry
California Supreme Court holds that universities disciplining students for sexual assault or intimate partner violence do not need to provide the accused student with an opportunity for real-time cross-examination of witnesses.
Read MoreWaszczuk v. UC Regents
Horvitz & Levy successfully defendant a summary judgment entered in favor of the UC Regents against a vexatious litigant.
Read MoreAllied Premier Ins. v. United Financial Cas. Co.
California Supreme Court holds commercial auto coverage does not persist indefinitely if insurer fails to cancel DMV certificates.
Read MoreCounty of Santa Clara v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court holds emergency medical service providers may maintain reimbursement actions against publicly operated health care service plans.
Read MoreCooley v. Hernandez
California Court of Appeal reverses rulings that prevented a personal representative from settling a decedent’s lawsuit.
Read MoreAlSayyad v. The Regents of The University of California
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in favor of employer based on lack of evidence of discriminatory motive for employee’s three-year suspension.
Read MoreLe v. The Regents of The University of California
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in favor of employer based on absence of causal link between protected activity and alleged retaliatory act.
Read MoreLeonard v. Peters
Ninth Circuit reverses summary judgment order in pro bono civil rights case on behalf of Oregon state prisoner.
Read MoreD.S. v. The Lion's Limos
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in a wrongful death action against a common carrier.
Read MoreBermudez v. Crunch Holdings, LLC
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment rejecting a gymgoer’s personal injury lawsuit.
Read MoreSmith v. Clovis Community Medical Center & Smith v. Gade
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment on MICRA statute of limitation grounds.
Read MoreUrick v. Urick III
California Court of Appeal holds that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a continuance after a party’s attorney was hospitalized days before trial.
Read MoreHoffmann v. Young
California Supreme Court rejects lower court’s expansive reading of the “express invitation exception” to California’s recreational use immunity statute.
Read MorePulliam v. USC
California Court of Appeal affirms defense verdict in wrongful termination action.
Read MoreGuardianship of Saul H.
California Supreme Court reverses Court of Appeal, holding Horvitz & Levy's client is entitled to state court findings allowing him to apply to the federal government for Special Immigrant Juvenile status.
Read MoreFranklin v. Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
Horvitz & Levy successfully defends summary judgment for hospital in medical malpractice action on actual and ostensible agency grounds.
Read MoreMontes v. YMCA of Glendale, California
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment, holding Horvitz & Levy’s client had no duty to remedy an open and obvious danger.
Read MoreCatalina Media Development, LLC v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp.
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for Horvitz & Levy’s client, holding indemnity agreement did not require client to pay other parties’ defense costs in underlying personal injury action.
Read MoreSanchez v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal issues alternative writ, causing trial court to vacate order that compelled Horvitz & Levy client to submit to mental examination
Read MoreColonial Van & Storage v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal grants Horvitz & Levy’s writ petition, holding that employer had no duty to protect its employee and her invitees from mass shooting inside the employee’s home.
Read MoreDavis v. Harano
California Court of Appeal affirms defense verdict in personal injury action, accepting Horvitz & Levy’s invited error and substantial evidence arguments.
Read MoreViasat v. Acacia Communications
California Court of Appeal affirms $49 million breach of contract verdict in complex commercial dispute involving misuse of intellectual property.
Read MoreMitchell v. Moses
California Court of Appeal reverses trial court order that dismissed defamation lawsuit brought by Horvitz & Levy’s clients.
Read MoreBrown v. El Dorado Union High School District
California Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of football injury lawsuit against high school district, finding no evidence of gross negligence and clarifying summary judgment procedure.
Read MoreRiskin v. Downtown LA Property Owners Association
California Court of Appeal reverses attorney fees award in California Public Records Act case.
Read MoreBerroteran v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court limits a party’s right to introduce in a later case deposition testimony obtained in an earlier case.
Read MoreMallonee v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
California Court of Appeal affirms order cutting attorney fees request by 85 percent in lemon law action.
Read MoreBlasco v. FCA
California Court of Appeal affirms nonsuit on punitive damages in lemon law case.
Read MoreOroville Hospital v. The Superior Court of Butte County
California Court of Appeal grants writ petition and orders judgment for the defense in elder abuse lawsuit.
Read MoreCovert v. FCA USA, LLC
California Court of Appeal reverses $200,000 attorney fees and costs award in lemon law action.
Read MoreEstate of Lamerle Johnson, Sr. v. Mayacamas Holdings LLC
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for resort operator and property owners in a wrongful/death survival action arising out of a tragic canoe accident.
Read MoreDitlevsen v. Pedersen
California Court of Appeal holds that Horvitz & Levy’s client is responsible for only a small fraction of plaintiff’s damages
Read MoreCarradine v. iDrip Vape LLC
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment, holding the “going-and-coming” rule precludes vicarious liability against a business for a car accident that occurred during the business owner’s commute.
Read MoreWebb v. General Cable
Court of Appeal overturns multi-million dollar jury verdict for lack of substantial evidence in asbestos case
Read MoreAlvarez v. Silva
California Court of Appeal reverses mutual domestic violence restraining order entered against our client
Read MoreSandoval v. Qualcomm
California Supreme Court reaffirms Privette doctrine, overturning $3.7 million jury verdict and directing changes to model jury instructions
Read MoreJogani v. Jogani
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of Horvitz & Levy client in partnership dispute, holding all of plaintiffs’ claims were time-barred
Read MoreBirden v. Regents of the University of California
California Court of Appeal reverses award of economic damages against Horvitz & Levy’s client in workplace discrimination and harassment action
Read MoreHuang v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal issues an alternative writ of mandate in favor of Horvitz & Levy’s clients, causing trial court to deem admitted key facts underlying a multi-million-dollar probate matter.
Read MoreAshby v. Ashby
California Court of Appeal affirms renewal of domestic violence restraining order in favor of Horvitz & Levy’s pro bono client
Read MoreGrossmont Union High School District v. Diego Plus Education Corporation
California Court of Appeal reverses orders that would have shut down charter schools serving at-risk students
Read MoreSwanson v. The Marley-Wylain Company
California Court of Appeal reverses $5.5 million judgment in mesothelioma case due to instructional error
Read MoreFishback v. FCA
Court of Appeal holds that trial court was not required to “show its work” when reducing or disallowing plaintiff’s attorney fees
Read MoreIssakhani v. Shadow Glen Homeowners Association, Inc.
Court of Appeal holds property owner not liable for failing to provide onsite parking to invitee
Read MoreReynoso/Lozano v. AWI Management
Court of Appeal affirms order dismissing wrongful death/personal injury action
Read MoreKhoshnevis v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
California Court of Appeal affirms order shifting costs to plaintiff who failed to recover more than defendant’s settlement offer.
Read MorePutt v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeal reverses multimillion dollar jury verdict finding Ford 100% at fault in an asbestos case
Read MoreMann v. The Regents of the University of California
Court of Appeal affirms judgment on FEHA claims for the UC Regents, finding no error or prejudice in verdict form or jury instructions
Read MorePinto v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Court of Appeal holds that an insurer’s failure to accept a reasonable settlement demand is not per se unreasonable, disapproving a controversial model jury instruction
Read MoreHolistic Supplements, LLC v. Stark
Court of Appeal reverses judgment and remands for a new trial in dispute over ownership of a Los Angeles marijuana dispensary
Read MoreRuiz Nunez v. FCA USA LLC
Court of Appeal limits express warranty claims against auto manufacturers for failed repairs and holds they owe no implied warranty on sales of used cars
Read MoreRios v. The Regents of the University of California
California Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of employment action for plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies
Read MoreFlores v. Liu
California Court of Appeal affirms a jury verdict, despite a finding of instructional error, in a professional negligence action against a surgeon
Read MoreA&S Metal Recycling, Inc. v. Wilson's Metal Exchange, Inc
California Court of Appeal affirms denial of anti-SLAPP motion in defamation case arising out of commercial dispute between business competitors
Read MoreGreen Gate Services, LLC v. Daniel Koetting
Horvitz & Levy obtains reversal of judgment confirming multimillion dollar arbitration award
Read MoreBorja v. Saxton
California Court of Appeal affirms favorable judgment for defense in personal injury action, rejecting plaintiff’s new trial bid
Read MoreHandlers-Bryman v. El Pollo Loco
Horvitz & Levy secures stipulated reversal of multimillion dollar judgment and injunction restricting El Pollo Loco’s franchise operations
Read MoreHann v. Hallberg
The Supreme Court grants motion to dismiss review, reinstating a favorable Court of Appeal’s opinion that prevented a forced partnership buyout and established that living trusts may serve as partners under California law
Read MoreLittle Cottage Caregivers v. Meiri
California Court of Appeal reinstates ownership interest in a medical marijuana collective
Read MoreShia v. Shia
California Court of Appeal reverses spousal support award because trial court failed to consider domestic violence evidence
Read MoreNewman v. Larios
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment based on insurer’s acceptance of plaintiff’s tactical settlement offer
Read MoreCurry v. Academy Pointe, Inc.
California Court of Appeal reduces $4.5 million punitive damages award to $750,000 in reasonable accommodation case against apartment owner and manager
Read MoreAlaniz v. Sun Pacific Shippers, L.P.
California Court of Appeal reverses judgment against landowner due to error in jury instructions
Read MoreMontoya v. Ford
Court of Appeal reverses judgment for plaintiff in lemon law case, rejecting statute of limitations tolling based on plaintiff’s membership in successively filed class actions
Read MoreScholes v. Lambirth Trucking Co.
Representing amicus curiae, Horvitz & Levy successfully argues in California Supreme Court that statute authorizing heightened damages for injury to trees does not apply to trees damaged by negligently spread fires
Read MoreAlexander v. Community Hospital of Long Beach
Court of Appeal reverses a discrimination and hostile work environment judgment against Horvitz & Levy’s client
Read MoreBlas v. U.S. Sports Camps
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for American Golf Corporation in personal injury case
Read MoreLahijani v. Hakakian
Horvitz & Levy successfully defends judgment for defendant homeowner in personal injury action
Read MoreHerod v. Parfums De Coeur Ltd. Corp.
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for defendant in personal injury/products liability case
Read MoreDuket v. Fremont Rideout Health Group
Court of Appeal affirms judgment for defendant in wrongful death/Elder Abuse Act case
Read MoreSamora v. Muhammad
Court of Appeal affirms favorable judgment for defendants in personal injury case
Read MoreAcoba v. Olivera Egg Ranch, LLC
Horvitz & Levy persuades Court of Appeal to affirm judgment following jury verdict for egg ranch in nuisance case
Read MoreDoe v. Department of Children and Family Services
Horvitz & Levy persuades Court of Appeal to affirm nonsuit for foster family agency in negligence case
Read MoreBennett v. Rancho California Water District
Horvitz & Levy persuades Court of Appeal to reverse a jury verdict awarding plaintiff over $800,000 against a public entity for alleged whistleblower retaliation
Read MoreTaulbee v. EJ Distribution Corp.
Horvitz & Levy obtains affirmance of jury verdict finding trucking company not liable for catastrophic freeway accident
Read MoreNapolitano Holdings v. Touchstone Climbing
Horvitz & Levy secures reversal of summary judgment in a commercial landlord’s breach of lease action
Read MoreEisen v. Tavangarian
California Court of Appeal disagrees with prior decision from the same division, reversing judgment requiring partial demolition of remodeled home
Read MoreBarton v. The Argen Corporation
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment of dismissal in products liability action against supplier of dental alloys
Read MoreHernandez v. First Student, Inc.
California Court of Appeal affirmed judgment allocating eighty percent of fault to the plaintiff who darted into the street on his bicycle
Read MoreZapata v. The Superior Court
California Court of Appeal issues order in response to writ petition, causing trial court to vacate order denying defendant's motion to quash service of the complaint.
Read MoreHan v. Hallberg
California Court of Appeal holds that living trusts may serve as partners under California law.
Read MoreZubin v. Toyota Motor Sales
Court of Appeal affirms favorable judgment for Toyota in Lemon Law case.
Read MoreStennett v. Miller
California Court of Appeal upholds wrongful death statute against equal protection challenge.
Read MoreSteele v. Bell-Carter Foods
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in products liability and warranty action against olive producer.
Read MoreStokes v. Muschinske
Court of Appeal affirms favorable judgment and holds that defense billing experts can use Medicare reimbursement rates to form their opinions on the reasonable value of medical services.
Read MoreJohnson v. The Raytheon Co.
California Court of Appeal issues published opinion affirming summary judgment in premises liability action.
Read MoreVilla Riviera Condominium Association v. Spectra Company et al.
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment for subcontractor in construction defect action.
Read MoreLicudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
California Court of Appeal affirms trial court ruling that a plaintiff's Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer was served too early to be in good faith.
Read MoreLovewell v. Stanford Federal Credit Union & Joan Opp
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for credit union & CEO against wrongful termination claims.
Read MoreHagan v. Torrance Memorial Medical Center
Horvitz & levy successfully defends judgment for hospital in medical malpractice action.
Read MoreHart v. Special Electric
Horvitz & Levy prevails on statute of repose issue in asbestos lawsuit.
Read MoreHuerta v. Kava Holdings, Inc.
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment for hotel in FEHA case.
Read MoreJabo v. YMCA of San Diego County
Court of Appeal upholds finding that YMCA owed no duty to use automated external defibrillator.
Read MoreHake v. Allied Fluid Products Corp.
Court of Appeal affirms nonsuit on ground that plaintiff's "every exposure" theory was insufficient to prove causation under Kansas law.
Read MoreRudolph v. Rudolph and Sletten, Inc
Court of Appeal rejects plaintiffs' attempt to circumvent workers' compensation exclusive-remedy rule in take-home asbestos case
Read MoreDavila v. Derby
California Court of Appeal reverses $4.2 million personal injury verdict because of inflammatory comments during trial.
Read MoreVictaulic v. American Home Assurance Company
Court of Appeal reverses $52 million Brandt fee and punitive damages award in insurance bad faith case.
Read MoreSimers v. Los Angeles Times Communications, LLC
Court of Appeal rejects constructive discharge claim.
Read MoreSheron Doll v. Mahin Ghaffari
California Court of Appeal affirms order denying attorney fees in landlord-tenant dispute.
Read MoreLockheed Litigation Cases
California Court of Appeal rules again for the defense in long-running toxic tort litigation
Read MoreDhillon v. John Muir Health
California Supreme Court resolves important administrative law issue, reversing dismissal of hospital’s appeal in staff privileges case
Read MoreOrtiz v. WMC-A, Inc.
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of hospital in spinal-injury case
Read MoreCuevas v. Contra Costa County
California Court of Appeal requires retrial of future medical expense claim to permit evidence of Medicaid and Affordable Care Act benefits
Read MoreMartinez v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of power line clearing contractor in negligence action
Read MoreHawkins v. St. John Missionary Baptist Church of Bakersfield
California Court of Appeal reverses judgment that ousted pastor from church
Read MoreSaller v. Crown Cork & Seal
California Court of Appeal reverses $3.6 million in punitive damages in products liability case
Read MoreAcqua Vista v. MWI, Inc.
California Court of Appeal reverses $24 million judgment against pipe supplier in construction defect case
Read MoreSarkisyan v. Newport Insurance Company
Court of Appeal affirms denial of class certification in favor of insurance company based on plaintiff’s failure to prove existence of ascertainable class and sufficient community of interest
Read MoreHoriike v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Company
California Supreme Court holds that buyer in real estate transaction is owed a fiduciary duty by salesperson who represents the seller
Read MoreWang v. Nibbelink
Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in favor of property owners on the basis of recreational immunity
Read MoreLicudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (2016)
California Court of Appeal publishes helpful opinion on “lost earning capacity” damages
Read MoreSantos M. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Court of Appeal rules for H&L pro bono clients in family law dispute over eligibility for immigration relief
Read MoreLudwig v. Hacienda Paraiso
California Court of Appeal reverses $10 million judgment against H&L client
Read MoreTrinity River Lumber Company et al. v. Weaverville Community Services District
California Court of Appeal finds public water district immune from liability for failure of water system to furnish sufficient water to extinguish a fire
Read MoreOlympic and Georgia Partners v. Arch Specialty Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal rules for H&L clients in insurance coverage dispute over major repairs to Ritz-Carlton residences
Read MoreFireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Heller
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for insurer in rescission action
Read MoreSheehe v. Kihagi
California Court of Appeal rules for H&L pro bono client in rent control dispute
Read MoreBertsch v. Mammoth Community Water District
California Court of Appeal issues published opinion affirming summary judgment for community association and water district in skateboard injury case
Read MoreMcClatchy v. Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass, LLP
Court of Appeal affirms ruling in favor of San Francisco law firm in probate dispute
Read MoreGopal v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
California Court of Appeal rejects enterprise liability theory and affirms summary judgment in favor of health insurer in wrongful death case
Read MoreAngel v. Winograd
California Court of Appeal reverses denial of anti-SLAPP motion in defamation case
Read MoreHaynes v. Kim
California Court of Appeal affirms defense verdict for corporation in auto accident case, rejecting agency theory
Read MoreLozano v. AWI Management Corporation
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment that found apartment manager not liable for shooting rampage
Read MoreCentral Metal v. Center Bank
California Court of Appeal affirms grant of anti-SLAPP motion in action arising from commercial lender’s receivership action
Read MoreCarter v. Heitzler
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in negligence suit arising from horseback riding injury.
Read MoreMurat v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in asbestos exposure case.
Read MoreHartford Casualty Insurance Company v. J.R. Marketing, L.L.C.
California Supreme Court permits insurers to seek reimbursement directly from Cumis counsel for objectively unreasonable billings.
Read MoreLockheed Litigation Cases (Group 9)
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in long-running toxic tort case.
Read MoreIronridge Global IV, Ltd. v. ScripsAmerica, Inc.
California Court of Appeal dismisses opposing party’s appeal under the disentitlement doctrine.
Read MoreRoman v. BRE Properties
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment for apartment owner accused of discrimination.
Read MoreRalphs Grocery Company v. Midtown Shopping Center Associates
California Court of Appeal reverses judgment against Ralphs Grocery Company in landlord-tenant dispute.
Read MoreDonaho v. County of Yuba
California Court of Appeal rules that public entity is not liable for placement of bus stop near freeway.
Read MoreAlbert v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal holds that trespass to trees is not covered by a general liability policy.
Read MoreCohen v. Sterling
Court of Appeal upholds order granting new trial following $17 million verdict arising out of apartment building fire.
Read MoreIn re Marriage of McCourt
California Court of Appeal rules in favor of former Dodgers owner Frank McCourt in marital dispute.
Read MoreBurdick v. Superior Court (Sanderson)
California Court of Appeal holds that out-of-state resident’s Facebook post about California resident does not necessarily create personal jurisdiction in California.
Read MoreJudicial Council Coordinated Proceedings 4435 TCP Cases (City of Redlands v. Shell Oil Co.)
California Court of Appeal affirms defense verdict for Shell Oil Company in case alleging groundwater contamination.
Read MoreCollin v. CalPortland Company
California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in asbestos injury action against joint compound manufacturer.
Read MoreCottini v. Enloe Medical Center
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of medical center.
Read MoreSafeway Inc. v. Superior Court (Hardin)
California Court of Appeal grants petition for writ of mandate in failure-to-warn suit against pharmacy.
Read MoreRunflatAmerica, LLC v. Michelin North America, Inc. et al.
California Court of Appeal rules for defendants in a shareholder derivative action brought by the former CEO of a company, who alleged his company should have sued the defendants for perceived business torts.
Read MoreEisenhower Medical Center v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal dismisses $500 million medical privacy claim against hospital.
Read MoreSqrow v. A.G.M.G.H. Five, the Ranch Limited Partnership
California Court of Appeal permits low-income seniors to proceed with challenge to 144-percent rent increase.
Read MoreMobasser v. Yermian
California Court of Appeal vacates jury’s award of emotional distress damages and punitive damages in family business dispute.
Read MoreMonroe v. Yurosek Farms LLC
California Court of Appeal holds that recreational use immunity applies to licensees as well as landowners.
Read MoreR.R. v. H.F.
California Court of Appeal orders trial court to enforce mother's rights to legal custody and reconsider her request for greater visitation with her now six-year-old child.
Read MoreHaggis v. Yari
California Court of Appeal reverses $12 million judgment in dispute over film profits, finding no substantial evidence to support trial court’s alter ego finding.
Read MoreGuo v. American Plus Bank N.A.
California Court of Appeal reverses fraud judgment against community bank.
Read MoreKmart Corporation v. Hartford Fire Insurance
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment for insurer on duty-to-defend issue and reinstates insurer’s claim for reimbursement.
Read MoreJay v. Mahaffey
California Court of Appeal affirms denial of anti-SLAPP motion in malicious prosecution case.
Read MoreMalin v. Singer
California Court of Appeal reverses trial court and orders dismissal of extortion claim against attorney.
Read MoreMercado v. Doctors Medical Center of Modesto, Inc.
California Court of Appeal reverses order denying employer’s motion to compel arbitration.
Read MoreCann v. Stefanec
Court of Appeal holds that primary assumption of risk doctrine bars suit by college swimmer injured in weight room accident.
Read MoreEl-Attar v. Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center
California Supreme Court unanimously reverses Court of Appeal regarding hospital procedures for reviewing adverse action on doctor’s application for staff privileges.
Read MoreS. R. v. Superior Court
Superior court grants domestic violence victim’s request for a waiver of court fees after Court of Appeal issues alternative writ of mandate.
Read MoreLawrence v. J.R. Enterprises, L.P.
California Court of Appeal upholds validity of 99 year lease for commercial property.
Read MoreTamas v. T.L. Pavlich Construction, Inc.
California Court of Appeal holds that jurors did not commit misconduct by using toy cars during deliberations to visualize auto accident.
Read MoreCorenbaum v. Lampkin
California Court of Appeal holds that evidence of “billed” but unpaid medical expenses is not admissible to prove future medical damages or noneconomic damages.
Read MoreMoran v. South Coast Medical Center
California Court of Appeal affirms hospital’s denial of medical staff privileges.
Read MoreSingh Educational Services v. Blueprint Test Preparation LLC
Court of Appeal rejects competitor’s attempt to shut down test preparation company in alleged theft of trade secrets action.
Read MoreJankey v. Lee
California Supreme Court holds that prevailing defendant in disability access action is entitled to mandatory award of attorney fees.
Read MoreDon Johnson Productions, Inc. v. Rysher Entertainment
California Court of Appeal reduces judgment in favor of actor Don Johnson from $53.2 million to $15 million in dispute arising out of a production contract’s copyright provision.
Read MoreBison Builders Inc. v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation
California Court of Appeal holds that elevator company is not required to indemnify general contractor for construction accident.
Read MoreHoward Entertainment, Inc. v. Kudrow
California Court of Appeal reverses summary judgment in favor of actress in contract dispute over withheld agent commissions.
Read MoreAmerican States Ins. Co. v. Ramirez
California Court of Appeal reverses $6 million judgment in insurance coverage dispute and orders entry of judgment for the defendant.
Read MoreFinley v. Club One, Inc.
Court of Appeal holds health club member’s personal injury lawsuit is barred by liability waiver in membership agreement.
Read MoreGarcia v. ConMed Corporation
California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of medical device manufacturer in products liability action.
Read MoreWang v. Heck
California Court of Appeal holds doctor not liable for recommending that the DMV reinstate the license of an epileptic patient.
Read MoreO'Neil v. Crane Co.
California Supreme Court holds that product manufacturers cannot be liable for injuries caused by replacement parts.
Read MoreGonzalez v. Southern California Gas Company
California Court of Appeal reverses judgment in wrongful death/premises liability case based on absence of legal duty.
Read MoreLos Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Alameda Produce Market LLC
California Supreme Court unanimously reverses Court of Appeal opinion in eminent domain dispute.
Read MoreBurlington Coat Factory v. Bella Terra Associates
California Court of Appeal upholds landlord’s interpretation of novel lease provision.
Read MoreBarrese v. Murray
California Court of Appeal reverses jury verdict and remands for reconsideration of motion for new trial.
Read MoreBehnke v. State Farm General Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal affirms pre-trial dismissal of policyholder's claims for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and bad faith in dispute over Cumis fees.
Read MoreAttitudes Hair & Nail Salon v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal issues peremptory writ reversing denial of summary judgment in case involving Unruh Act and Disabled Persons Act.
Read MoreIbarra v. Carpinello
California Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of defamation lawsuit in high-profile MMA dispute.
Read MoreIn re Pineda
Horvitz & Levy petition to California Supreme Court results in reconsideration of ruling against abused minor.
Read MoreBruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc. et al.
California Supreme Court reverses Court of Appeal opinion that permitted plaintiff to proceed with putative class action more than five years after filing complaint.
Read MoreState Farm v. Lee
California Court of Appeal affirms order granting motion to strike cross-complaint for abuse of process.
Read MoreLi v. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
California Court of Appeal affirms order denying motion to strike malicious prosecution action against Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
Read MoreHuitt v. Southern California Gas Company
California Court of Appeal reverses $12.6 million judgment, including $10 million in punitive damages, and directs entry of judgment for defendant in failure-to-warn case.
Read MoreMolina v. Shell Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal affirms defense verdict in product defect action against chemical manufacturers, rejecting plaintiffs' attempt to use jury instructions developed for asbestos litigation.
Read MoreRaymond v. Flynt
California Court of Appeal reverses arbitration award against employer in sexual harassment case.
Read MoreTverberg v. Filner Construction, Inc.
California Supreme Court limits scope of hirer liability to self-employed contractors.
Read MoreCollins v. Plant Insulation Company
California Court of Appeal reverses $1.9 million judgment in asbestos action and orders new trial on allocation of fault.
Read MoreBoeken v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
California Supreme Court rules that a plaintiff who previously sued for loss of consortium based on a spouse’s personal injuries cannot, consistent with the res judicata doctrine, again pursue post-death consortium damages in a second lawsuit for wrongful death.
Read MoreWalton et al. v. The William Powell Co.
California Court of Appeal reverses $5 million judgment in asbestos case, holding that valve maker is not liable as a matter of law for asbestos that was used in conjunction with its product.
Read MoreKirk v. First American Title Insurance Company
California Court of Appeal issues opinion approving the use of ethical screens to avoid vicarious law firm disqualification.
Read MoreLogix v. Faherty
California Court of Appeal reverses $40 million judgment in dispute over satellite television royalties.
Read MoreFire Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal issues writ of mandate, directing trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of insurer in coverage dispute.
Read MoreMnatsakanyan v. CalFarm Insurance Company
Court of Appeal reverses $4.6 million judgment on arbitration award.
Read MoreBaker v. National Interstate Insurance Company
California Court of Appeal reverses $12 million judgment in insurance coverage dispute and orders entry of judgment for the defendant.
Read MorePrediWave Corporation v. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett et al.
California Court of Appeal reverses trial court order that dismissed $2 billion attorney malpractice suit under anti-SLAPP statute.
Read MoreGriffin Dewatering Corp. v. Northern Ins. Co. of New York
California Court of Appeal reverses an $11 million judgment, including $10 million in punitive damages, and orders entry of judgment for the defendant in insurance bad faith case.
Read MorePauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.
California Court of Appeal reverses $30 million judgment in business dispute arising from negotiations to develop and manage a hotel and casino on an Indian reservation.
Read MoreSilverbrand v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court extends “prison delivery rule” to notices of appeal in civil cases.
Read MoreIn Re Episcopal Church Cases
California Supreme Court rules in favor of national church in property dispute with breakaway local parish.
Read MoreRudolph v. Rudolph and Sletten, Inc
California Court of Appeal opening brief, arguing that the doctrine of workers' compensation exclusivity applies to claims alleging that an employer is responsible for take-home asbestos exposures.
Read MoreMadrigal v. Allstate Indemnity Company
Amicus curiae brief on behalf of insurance trade associations addressing whether an insurer can be held liable for bad faith under a "duty to settle" theory when the insurer offers policy limits within a reasonable period of time, even if shortly after an artificial deadline imposed by a third-party claimant.
Read MoreSheridan v. Touchstone Television Productions, LLC
Petition asking the California Supreme Court petition to grant review in Desperate Housewives employment dispute, to clarify the scope of the exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine.
Read MoreBurlage v. Superior Court
Answer to petition for review in the California Supreme Court, arguing against review of a published Court of Appeal decision that affirmed an order vacating an arbitration award.
Read MorePractice Areas
- Amicus Support & Shaping the Law
- Anti-SLAPP Motions & Appeals
- Business & Commercial Law
- California Supreme Court & Court of Appeal
- Class Actions
- Consumer Law
- Entertainment Law
- Federal Appellate Practice
- First Amendment
- Healthcare Litigation
- Insurance Litigation
- Intellectual Property
- Labor & Employment Litigation
- Premises Liability
- Pro Bono
- Products Liability & Toxic Torts
- Professional Responsibility & Liability
- Public Entity Liability
- Punitive Damages
- Real Property Litigation
- Trial Consultation