Background graphic
At the Lectern

The California Supreme Court and the SCOTUS October 2021 term

July 6, 2022

How did the California Supreme Court do at the U.S. Supreme Court during the latter’s most recent term, which ended last week? Here’s a look.

The most prominent case featured an indirect, negative review of an arbitration decision. In Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, the Court disapproved one rule stated years earlier in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348, cert. denied, CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC v. Iskanian (2015) 574 U.S. 1121. (See: SCOTUS disapproves California Supreme Court decision.)

Other than Viking River Cruises, the U.S. Supreme Court saw no reason to alter any California Supreme Court decisions. The high court’s only direct assessments of those decisions resulted in eight certiorari petition denials, all but one of them affirmances in death penalty appeals. The Court even declined to hear one case — People v. Gonzalez — in which the California court had criticized the U.S. Supreme Court’s Sixth Amendment jurisprudence as unclear.

These are the cert denials:

The list of cert denials doesn’t include those concerning California Supreme Court decisions without opinions, such as summary denials of habeas corpus or writ petitions or State Bar matters.

There was a larger number of connections between the two courts during the October 2020 term. (See here.)

Put Our Proven Appellate Expertise to Work for You.

For over 60 years, we've preserved judgments, reversed errors, and reduced awards in some of California’s most high-profile appellate cases.

Explore our practices Explore Careers
Horvitz