Background graphic
Uncategorized

Massachusetts Supreme Court upholds $18 million punitive damages award (Aleo v. Toys R Us)

September 14, 2013

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued this opinion today, affirming a $2.6 million compensatory damages award and a $18 million punitive damages award in a products liability case against Toys R Us. The plaintiff claimed that Toys R Us sold a defective inflatable pool slide that collapsed and severely injured the 29-year-old plaintiff. 

The Supreme Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the punitive damages were grossly excessive.  The court said that although the defendant’s conduct was “only grossly negligent, rather than malicious or willful,” it was still sufficiently reprehensible to support an $18 million punitive damages award.  In California, by contrast, gross negligence alone is not sufficient to support any award of punitive damages. (See, e.g., Flyer’s Body Shop v. Ticor Title Ins.)

Put Our Proven Appellate Expertise to Work for You.

For over 60 years, we've preserved judgments, reversed errors, and reduced awards in some of California’s most high-profile appellate cases.

Explore our practices Explore Careers
Horvitz