Background graphic
Results

Malin v. Singer (2013)

California Court of Appeal reverses trial court and orders dismissal of extortion claim against attorney.

In this appeal, Horvitz & Levy represented well-known entertainment lawyer Martin Singer. The California Court of Appeal agreed with Horvitz & Levy’s arguments and reversed the trial court’s determination that Singer had committed criminal extortion by sending a pre-lawsuit demand letter. In an opinion that has garnered much attention in the legal and entertainment press, the court held Singer’s letter was protected by the First Amendment and the litigation privilege. Consequently, the court reversed the trial court’s denial of Singer’s anti-SLAPP motion with respect to the extortion claim. The opinion makes clear that lawyers have wide breathing space to advocate for their clients in pre-suit demand letters.

Download IconView Opinion

Related Attorneys

Malin v. Singer (2013)

Jeremy B. Rosen

Partner San Francisco
Malin v. Singer (2013)

Felix Shafir

Partner Los Angeles

Put Our Proven Appellate Expertise to Work for You.

For over 60 years, we've preserved judgments, reversed errors, and reduced awards in some of California’s most high-profile appellate cases.

Explore our practices Explore Careers
Horvitz