Background graphic
California Court of Appeal

Another punitive damages award reversed due to insufficient financial condition evidence (Wilson v. Autler)

November 26, 2014

This unpublished opinion is the latest example of the California Court of Appeal vacating a punitive damages award because the plaintiff failed to present meaningful evidence of the defendant’s financial condition.

The defendant testified that she owned a home and paid cash for it.  But the Court of Appeal (Fourth District, Division Two) said that evidence was not nearly sufficient to support a punitive damages award; the plaintiff presented no evidence of the value of the house, the defendant’s other assets or liabilities, or her income and expenses.  As a result, the court vacated $50,000 in punitive damages.

 

Put Our Proven Appellate Expertise to Work for You.

For over 60 years, we've preserved judgments, reversed errors, and reduced awards in some of California’s most high-profile appellate cases.

Explore our practices Explore Careers
Horvitz