Conference recap — Part II

Melissa B. Whalen

Counsel
Los Angeles

Clients benefit from Melissa’s thorough research and carefully written appellate briefs.

Melissa has served as the principal attorney for numerous appeals, including in arbitration, personal injury, insurance coverage, and business dispute cases.  In addition to briefing and arguing appeals, Melissa regularly guides clients through the process of preserving the record in the trial court, attacking judgments in the trial court through posttrial motions, staying enforcement of judgments, and perfecting an appeal.  Melissa also frequently partners with trial teams to develop legal strategies and preserve appellate issues during trial.  She also maintains an active pro bono practice, and recently secured a favorable published decision reversing an order denying her client’s request to renew a domestic violence restraining order.

In 2019, Melissa clerked for Judge Steve Kim, a magistrate judge at the United States District Court for the Central District of California.  The following year, she clerked on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for Judge Ferdinand Fernandez.  She returned to Horvitz & Levy in 2021 to continue her career as an appellate attorney and now manages the appellate fellowship program that first brought her to the firm in 2017.

Melissa graduated magna cum laude from Loyola Law School, where she served as Chief Research Editor of the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, and was elected to the Order of the Coif.  Melissa obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in History, summa cum laude, from George Washington University.

Credentials

Education

Clerkships

Bar Admissions

Professional Associations

Awards

Representative Matters

Vallejo City Unified School District v. Superior Court (2026)

California Court of Appeal holds that a school district is immune from liability for an off-campus student suicide.

Samuelian v. Life Generations Healthcare, LLC (2024)

In a published opinion, California Court of Appeal holds that noncompetition provisions are binding on partial owners of a business unless the provisions are unreasonable, reversing confirmation of a $40 million arbitration award.

G.G. v. G.S. (2024)

California Court of Appeal holds that the Domestic Violence Protection Act protects against all types of abuse, including stalking, such that courts may not distinguish between physical and nonphysical abuse when deciding whether to renew a restraining order.

Cheesman v. Ford Motor Co. (2024)

Washington Court of Appeals affirms defense summary judgment in product liability action.

Sanchez v. Superior Court (2022)

California Court of Appeal issues alternative writ, causing trial court to vacate order that compelled Horvitz & Levy client to submit to mental examination.

Nikmanesh v. Walmart (2022)

Federal district court reduces $27.3 million punitive damages award to $800,400 and denies plaintiff attorney fees.

Publications