Attorney Search
Advocacy at a Higher Level

Horvitz & Levy is a solutions-based firm focused on appellate success. We are distinguished by our commitment to responsive service and on-going innovation in the areas of civil appellate litigation, amicus curiae support, and trial strategy consultation.

Our firm history, honors and awards, and locations speak to our collaborative approach and commitment to serving clients as well as the outstanding legal resources we bring to bear.

LEARN MORE ABOUT HORVITZ & LEVY
We pride ourselves in producing good results for our clients. Below are selected examples of our clients’ recent victories on appeal. Click the links to read more details.

Drost v. Sheridan (2025)

California Court of Appeal affirms application of MICRA to reduce damages award against chiropractor from $29.5 million to $250,000.

Ward v. Billinglsey (2025)

California Court of Appeal affirms defense judgment after plaintiff claims discrimination in jury selection.

Charlie L. v. Kangavari (2025)

California Court of Appeal publishes opinion holding that a statute providing procedural safeguards for ER surgeons against medical malpractice claims also protects other physicians who consult remotely with the ER department

Navarro v. Cervera (2025)

Court of Appeal emphasizes that Domestic Violence Protection Act must be applied to achieve its protective purposes.

Collins v. Diamond Generating Corporation (2024)

California Court of Appeal reverses $104 million wrongful death judgment based on trial court’s refusal to instruct jury on the Privette doctrine.

Aldaco v. FMC (2024)

California Court of Appeal rules that used vehicles sold with a remaining new car warranty balance are not “consumer goods” within the meaning of the Song-Beverly Act.

Hill Family LP v. Trader Joe's (2024)

California Court of Appeal rules that Trader Joe’s is entitled to express indemnity arising out of a lease agreement.

Lloyd v. Byrd Technologies (2024)

California Court of Appeal affirms judgment for product defendant, rejecting plaintiff’s challenge to the trial court’s response to jury questions.

Rodriguez v. FCA (2024)

California Supreme Court rules that used vehicles sold with a remaining new car warranty balance are not “new motor vehicles” subject to the Song-Beverly Act’s refund-or-replace remedy.

Watts v. Pneumo Abex (2024)

California Court of Appeal reverses for new trial in asbestos case.

Page 1 of 36