Supreme Court permits statutory reduction of Three Strikes sentence that dissent calls an “endorse[ment] [of] legislative overreach”

Rebecca G. Powell

Associate
Los Angeles

Rebecca helps clients by drawing on a broad base of appellate and trial litigation experience.

She has taken the lead on a variety of civil litigation matters through the lifecycle of complex cases, from initial pleadings and dispositive motions, to serving as embedded appellate counsel during trials, through appellate briefing and oral argument. She has served as the principal attorney for numerous appeals, including in breach of contract, personal injury, class action, and business dispute cases. She has experience representing a wide range of clients and issues, including handling products liability and breach of warranty matters for auto manufacturers, and representing media and entertainment clients in commercial suits.

Rebecca has been certified as an appellate specialist by the California State Bar’s Board of Legal Specialization and serves on the Executive Committee of the ABA’s Council of Appellate Lawyers. Rebecca maintains an active pro bono practice, including as the co-director of the Pepperdine Caruso School of Law’s Ninth Circuit Appellate Advocacy Clinic.

Before joining the firm, Rebecca practiced as a commercial litigation and government investigations associate at Covington & Burling LLP in Los Angeles, and as a litigation associate at Durham Jones & Pinegar in Salt Lake City. She also served as a judicial law clerk on the Utah Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Credentials

Education

Clerkships

Bar Admissions

Professional Associations

Awards

Representative Matters

Bent v. Garland (2024)

Ninth Circuit relies on an amicus brief filed by Horvitz & Levy to hold that a criminal conviction vacated by a California statute cannot later trigger federal immigration proceedings.

Greisman v. FCA US, LLC (2024)

In partially published opinion, California Court of Appeal affirms order enforcing lemon law settlement that plaintiff’s counsel attempted to disavow.

Al Shikha v. Lyft (2024)

In a published opinion, California Court of Appeal holds there is no common-law duty to run criminal background checks on passengers before they can be permitted to use the Lyft rideshare app.

Long v. Sugai (2024)

Ninth Circuit issues published opinion in favor of H&L pro bono client in civil rights case.

Perez v. Oakdale Irrigation District (2023)

California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment in a published opinion preserving “canal immunity” for public entities in a wrongful death action.

Leonard v. Peters (2023)

Ninth Circuit reverses summary judgment order in pro bono civil rights case on behalf of Oregon state prisoner.

Urick v. Urick III (2022)

California Court of Appeal holds that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a continuance after a party’s attorney was hospitalized days before trial.

Mitchell v. Moses (2022)

California Court of Appeal reverses trial court order that dismissed defamation lawsuit brought by Horvitz & Levy’s clients.

Carradine v. iDrip Vape LLC (2021)

California Court of Appeal affirms summary judgment, holding the “going-and-coming” rule precludes vicarious liability against a business for a car accident that occurred during the business owner’s commute.

Jogani v. Jogani (2021)

California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of Horvitz & Levy client in partnership dispute, holding all of plaintiffs’ claims were time-barred

Little Cottage Caregivers v. Meiri (2020)

California Court of Appeal reinstates ownership interest in a medical marijuana collective

Carr v. AutoNation (2020)

Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of trade secrets action against Horvitz & Levy's client

Publications