Attorney Search
Advocacy at a Higher Level

Horvitz & Levy is a solutions-based firm focused on appellate success. We are distinguished by our commitment to responsive service and on-going innovation in the areas of civil appellate litigation, amicus curiae support, and trial strategy consultation.

Our firm history, honors and awards, and locations speak to our collaborative approach and commitment to serving clients as well as the outstanding legal resources we bring to bear.

LEARN MORE ABOUT HORVITZ & LEVY

May 24, 2023

Hodges v. Cedar-sinai Medical Center

Plaintiff was fired for refusing to get a flu vaccine despite not having a medically recognized excuse from the vaccination requirement. Plaintiff sued her employer, alleging disability discrimination and related claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff appealed.

The Court of Appeal affirmed, holding that plaintiff failed to offer direct evidence that defendant acted with a “prohibited motive.” The court noted that direct evidence must prove a fact “without inference or presumption” and plaintiff’s claim of a discriminatory motive, without more, is not direct evidence. The court further held that plaintiff failed to rebut defendant’s claim that plaintiff was neither disabled nor able to prove that getting vaccinated posed a risk of developing a disability. A disability under the FEHA, the court held, requires evidence “that the symptoms are sufficiently severe to make a major life activity, such as working, difficult.”