|
Pro Bono Practice
Horvitz
& Levy LLP is committed to public service. That is why, in
addition to substantial attorney involvement in bar association
and judicial committees, the firm regularly makes its appellate
expertise available in a varied array of pro bono cases. The
firm has handled appeals as counsel both for parties
and for amici curiae on behalf of or in conjunction
with such groups as the Harriett Buhai Center for Family Law,
The Alliance for Children's Rights, Public Counsel, and NOW
Legal Defense and Education Fund.
In 1993, Horvitz & Levy
LLP and one of its partners, David Ettinger, received the Harriett Buhai
Center for Family Law's "Hall
of Fame" award. Mr. Ettinger is the Center’s current
Vice President of Program Services and has been a Board member
since 1998. His appellate work with Horvitz & Levy colleagues
on behalf of low income litigants was featured in the Harriett
Buhai Center's 2005 Annual
Report.
In Durando
v. City of Los Angeles, Horvitz & Levy LLP
has recently helped Public Counsel, the largest pro bono
law firm in the nation, to protect the rights of six
disabled children and their adoptive parents. After submitting
six writ petitions and extensive briefing for the family
challenging adverse administrative rulings, Horvitz & Levy
obtained a substantial six-figure settlement from the
State of California on their behalf. (Read the Daily
Journal article about the Durando case.)
Most recently, the California
Supreme Court has appointed Horvitz & Levy LLP as counsel
for a previously unrepresented
litigant in Silverbrand v. County
of Los Angeles,
review granted Aug. 16, 2006, S143929, a matter in which
the Supreme Court will decide an important legal issue concerning
equality of access to the appellate courts in civil cases: "Does
the 'prison delivery' rule apply to the filing of a notice
of appeal in a civil case, and
thus make timely a notice of appeal deposited in the prison
legal mail system before the expiration of the jurisdictional
deadline but not received by the trial court until after
that deadline has passed?"
Horvitz & Levy LLP's past pro bono
cases include: Cruz
v. Superior Court (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th
175 (amicus brief supporting indigent litigants who were
wrongfully denied fee waivers to proceed in forma pauperis); The
Alliance for Children's Rights v. Los Angeles County
Department of
Children and Family Services (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th
1129 (defending against attack on the Juvenile Court's authority
to monitor the frequency of the Department's social workers'
visitation of dependent foster children); Conservatorship
of Wendland (2001) 26 Cal.4th 519 (amicus brief
supporting conservator/wife's decision to withdraw artificial
nutrition
and hydration from severely brain damaged and physically
impaired conservatee/husband); Hi-Voltage Wire Works,
Inc. v. City of San Jose (2000) 24 Cal.4th 537 (amicus
brief supporting constitutionality of city's public contracting
outreach program); United States v. Morrison (2000)
529 U.S. 598 (amicus brief supporting constitutionality
of
Congress's power to provide in Violence Against Women Act
a federal cause of action for victims of gender-motivated
violence); Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education
(1999) 526 U.S. 629 (amicus curiae brief supporting private
damages action against a school board under federal Title
IX in cases of student-on-student harassment); Hogoboom
v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 653 (challenging
a fee imposed by the superior court for mediation in family
law and domestic violence cases); J.W. v. Superior Court
(1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 958 (representing a mother and son
precluded from bringing a paternity and child support action
by superior
court refusal to appoint mother as the son's guardian ad
litem because she was not a lawyer and could not afford
to hire
one). See also "Lawyering
and Volunteerism," a California Litigation
Magazine article highlighting (at page 19) pro bono work
by Horvitz & Levy attorney, M.C.
Sungaila.
To see samples of Horvitz & Levy
LLP's pro bono appellate work, click the following
links:
Cruz v. Superior Court
The
Alliance for Children's Rights v. Los Angeles County Department
of Children and Family Services
Conservatorship
of Wendland
Download
free Adobe Acrobat Reader software for viewing Adobe Acrobat
files.
Home
| Firm Directory | About H &
L | Practice Areas | H
& L News
Seminars | Publications
| Recruiting | Directions
| Links | Site
Map
|