Case Information:
Philip Morris USA v. Mayola Williams

  Case Summary: Philip Morris USA v. Williams
  Search our site
 
 

DISCLAIMER

 
 
     
 

Case Information


Philip Morris USA v. Mayola Williams

United States Supreme Court Case No. 05-1256


Supreme Court Docket

Status: After the jury in this case returned a multi-million punitive damages award, the trial court denied defendant's new trial motion but ordered a reduction of the punitive award on the ground that it was unconstitutionally excessive. The Court of Appeals reversed, reinstating the punitive verdict, and, on February 6, 2006, the Oregon Supreme Court issued its opinion affirming the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and issued its opinion on February 20, 2007, remanding the matter to the Oregon courts for further consideration in light of the court's analysis that due process requires a court, upon request by the defendant, to protect against the danger of an award that punishes the defendant for harm the defendant may have caused to nonparties. Click here for a summary of the US Supreme Court's decision.

On January 31, 2008, the Oregon Supreme Court issued its opinion, again affirming the punitive award. The court concluded that, although the defendant had invoked its due process rights by proposing an instruction containing language correctly anticipating the due process principles articulated by the US Supreme Court, the defendant nonetheless was not entitled to a new trial based on rejection of that instruction because the proposed instruction contained certain additional language that was not correct under Oregon state law.

Petitioner's Brief - 7/28/2006
Respondents' Brief - 9/15/2006
Petitioner's Reply Brief - 10/16/2006
U.S. Supreme Court opinion - 2/20/2007

Oregon Supreme Court opinion on remand - 1/31/2008

Articles of interest:

May 30, 2006 article: Orders: Court to Hear Tobacco Appeal

May 31, 2006 article: Supreme Court Will Hear Case on High Punitive Damages

Prior filings:

Oregon Court of Appeals

Appellant's Opening Brief on Remand - 9/03/2003
Court of Appeals' Opinion - 6/09/2004

Oregon Supreme Court

Oregon Supreme Court Opinion - 2/06/2006

United States Supreme Court

Petition for Certiorari - 3/30/2006
Opposition to Petition for Certiorari - 5/01/2006

Amicus Curiae Brief of the Product Liability Advisory Council - 5/01/2006
Amicus Curiae Brief of the United States Chamber of Commerce - 5/01/2006

Related Opinion: Estate of Michelle Schwarz v. PMI (Ore. Supreme Court) - 5/17/2006

 

Home | Firm Directory | About H & L | Practice Areas | H & L News
Seminars | Publications | Recruiting | Directions | Links | Site Map