Enlarge text E-mail this page Contact Us Printer-friendly page RSS feeds


  • Duke University School of Law
    • J.D. and L.L.M. in International and Comparative Law, Order of the Coif, 1997
  • Cornell University
    • B.A., magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, 1993


  • Hon. Ferdinand F. Fernandez, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (1999-2000)
  • Hon. Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. District Court, Central District of California (1997-1998)

Bar Admissions

  • California
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of California


Jeremy B. Rosen
Jeremy B. Rosen

vcard vCard
Print to PDF Print to PDF

Jeremy B. Rosen

Mr. Rosen is a partner at the firm, which he joined in 2001. He is a California State Bar Certified Appellate Specialist and a member of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers. He has been lead appellate counsel in dozens of appeals in a wide variety of areas (his name currently appears on more than 50 published opinions and many more unpublished opinions, and he has presented more than 40 appellate oral arguments, including to the Ninth Circuit, California Supreme Court, and five of the six appellate districts in the California Court of Appeal). In particular, Mr. Rosen has developed an expertise in the First Amendment, California’s anti-SLAPP statute, the law of defamation, the application of the litigation privilege, and challenges to arbitration awards. Mr. Rosen has been invited to speak on these and other topics at numerous conferences.   

Mr. Rosen has briefed numerous cases in the California Supreme Court, arguing seven of them. His cases in the Supreme Court have involved important issues regarding the scope of California’s anti-SLAPP statute, the Unruh Act, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Statute...

Show More...


  • When Demand Letters Constitute Extortion In California (Sept. 23, 2016) Law360
  • Revitalizing Calif.’s Often Overlooked Legislative Privilege (Aug. 9, 2016) Law360
  • Speak Free Act Prevents SLAPP in Face to Free Speech (July 15, 2016) The Hill
  • Speaking Freely (Summer 2016) ABTL Report
  • California’s Anti-SLAPP Law is Not Systematically Abused (June 30, 2016) Law360
  • Weekly Appellate Report (April 29, 2016), Daily J.
  • The Fine Line Between Protected Demand Letters and Extortion (2015) California Litigation, Vol. 28, No. 1, p. 11
  • Arbitration: Be Careful What You Wish For (Mar. 24, 2014) Corporate Counsel [online exclusive]
  • SLAAP Update (Dec. 2012) California Lawyer, pp. 36-38
  • Petitions for Review in the California Supreme Court (June 2012) Orange County Lawyer, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 32-36
  • Why We Need a Federal Anti-SLAPP Law (June 8, 2012) Daily J., p. 3
  • The Wide-Ranging Applications of Calif. Anti-SLAPP Law (Feb. 14, 2012) Law 360
  • Uncertainty looms over anti-SLAPP issues in 2011 (Dec. 20, 2011) Daily J., p. 4
  • Petitions for Review in the California Supreme Court (June, 2011) LACBA E-Publication, Vol. II, No. 21
  • The 2010 Election and the New Chief Justice: How Will the State Supreme Court Change? (Oct. 5, 2010) Daily J., p. 5
  • California 2010: The Courts and the Economy (Oct. 2010) Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies
  • California 17200: Its Nature, Function, and Limits (Summer 2010) State Court Docket Watch
  • Another Exception for Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards (June 15, 2010) Daily J., p. 7
  • California: Unfair Competition Law (Summer 2009) State Court Docket Watch, at p. 2
  • 2 Cal. Civil Writ Practice (Cont.Ed.Bar 4th ed. 2008) Petition for Writ of Supercedeas, ch. 26, pp. 681-702
  • Where No Court Has Gone Before: The California Supreme Court Imposes Modest Limits On The Use Of Parol Evidence (1st Qtr. 2007) Verdict, pp. 42-44
  • Anti-SLAPP Statutes and Peer Review (Nov. 2006) Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy, Vo. 24, No. 2A, p. 7
  • Unmasking “crack_smoking_jesus”: Do Internet Service Providers Have a Tarasoff Duty to Divulge the Identity of a Subscriber who is Making Death Threats? (2003) 25 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal (Comm/Ent) 683
  • Excessive Verdicts Affect Both “Real People” and “the Powerful” (Sept. 2001) L.A. Daily J., Vol. 114, No. 168
  • The Independent Counsel Act: An Unconstitutional Delegation of Power to Judges (2001) Federalism & Separation of Powers News, Vol. 3, No. 1
  • China, Emerging Economics, and the World Trade Order (1997) 46 Duke L.J. 1519