![]() |
| NEW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION AFFIRMING EXCLUSION OF EXPERT TESTIMONY On March 28, 2006,
the Court of Appeal granted the defendants' request to publish its
opinion
in Geffcken
v. D'Andrea, Case No. B176232, outlining the
criteria for excluding expert testimony in California. The Court of Appeal
affirmed. The Court reasoned that (1) the mold sampling data on which
Dr. Ordog
relied was properly excluded under Evidence Code
section 352, (2) the blood tests on which Dr. Ordog relied were properly
excluded under Kelly-Frye because the plaintiffs failed to show
the blood tests were generally accepted in the relevant scientific
community, and (3)
Dr. Ordog's opinions were properly excluded under Evidence Code section
801 because "in view of the absence of any reliable evidence that
[plaintiffs] had been exposed to mycotoxins at the properties in question,
Dr. Ordog's opinions were speculative and conjectural." If you do not wish to continue to receive these informational bulletins, please e-mail jpaul@horvitzlevy.com with a subject line "UNSUBSCRIBE." Copyright © 2006 Horvitz & Levy LLP. All rights reserved.
|